It is *the* most widely known public secret in theoretical physics, ever since 1911.

From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>

Subject: The entanglement of matter and geometry, arXiv:1412.1807v1 [gr-qc]

Date: December 6, 2014 at 11:37:02 AM EST

To: Craig J Hogan <craighogan@uchicago.edu>, cjhogan@fnal.gov

"... the nature of the entanglement of matter and geometry is not
known, because it depends on unknown quantum degrees of freedom of the
geometry."
----

In fact, the nature of the entanglement of matter and geometry is
known: see Relative Scale Spacetime,
http://vixra.org/abs/1410.0194

Should you or any of your colleagues have doubts, check out Fig. 8, p.
14, at the link above. It is *the* most widely known public secret in
theoretical physics, ever since 1911.

You are the Director of Fermilab Center for Particle Astrophysics, and
there's no way to pretend that you know nothing about it.

Once I hear from you, I will show you where you went wrong in your
arXiv:1412.1807v1 [gr-qc], and explain your errors.

Sincerely,

D. Chakalov

my aim is to offer this model to top minds in modern physics and cosmology

From: "Mihai Grumazescu" <grumius@mail.com>

Subject: Quantum gravity model

Date: December 2, 2014  

Hello Professor X,

 

An intriguing experiment made me realize that there is a possibility of understanding the underlying secret of gravitation in a very intuitive way.

 

I modified an older invention of mine and built what is called an inertial propulsion or impulse device in the form of a mechanical oscillator. Inertia itself is a very intriguing property of matter and I was curious to test if inertial propulsion really works. But the intellectual satisfaction given by the success of the experiment was nothing compared with the prospect to use it as an analogous for understanding the kinetic movement of gas molecules and the Brownian motion. Then, I devised a model that can explain many things, including gravitation, based on just one assumption which is, after all, very plausible. What if the oscillation of the atomic nucleus is not symmetrical in respect to its center of mass, as we know so far? What if said oscillation is an asymmetric stretch one, just like my mechanical oscillator, which should impart a linear moment to the nucleus? The nucleus will further "drag" the electronic shell, the whole atom being in a constant motion.

The asymmetric stretch  mode of vibration of the carbon dioxide molecule was detected through IR spectroscopy. I believe this vibration is the result of the aforementioned nuclear oscillation.

 

Please find attached my article “A quantum oscillator that could explain gravity”.

I also created a video showing the experiment described in the article which can be seen at:

 

https://www.dropbox.com/sc/ul5jkpvkip5zc8z/AACiL0nu1z1NKPUADo9JLMYLa

 

I seek your honest opinion on the proposed intuitive model of gravitation. I agree with Sir Roger Penrose who said “science is a great deal more than mindless computation”. For this reason, I avoided formulae, which make the article to appear less academic and more like an essay. However, sharing "a story" is more likely to trigger different ideas in the readers' minds because reading is always associated with the unique unconscious  mind of each person. What we keep in the back of our mind is our whole experience and expertise.

 

Therefore, my aim is to offer this model to top minds in modern physics and cosmology and I hope to obtain their approval, disapproval and/or suggestions. I am interested to learn from you if my vision on how gravitation works has any merit and if it can be related to other theories.

 

Thank you for your time.

 

Sincerely,

Mihai Grumazescu
Ottawa, ON, Canada
Email: grumius@mail.com