Our vision is that the progress of physics requires respect to the physics heritage.

From: Bruce Lamar Rosenberg <brues.1@comcast.net>

Subject: Amrit Sorli et al Energy - Mass -Gravity Theory first page.

Hi Folks,
Thought you might be interested in this.
The entire text is available as a .pdf file.
Bruce

*Energy - Mass -Gravity Theory*
Amrit Sorli1, Magi Mageshwaran2. David Fiscaletti3
'Foundations of Physics Institute, Idrija, Slovenia    •
2St: Joseph's College; Physics. Department, Bangalore, India 3Space Life Institute, San Lorenzo in Campo (PU), Italy
Email address:
sorli.ainrit@gmail.com (A. Sorli), magesh.phys@gmail.com (M. Mageshwaran), spacelife.institute@gmail.com (D. Fiscaletti)
To cite this article:
Amrit Sorli, Magi Mageshwaran, David Fiscaletti. Energy - Mass - Gravity Theory. American Journal of Modem Physics. Special Issue: Insufficiency of Big Bang Cosmology. Vol. 5, No. 4-1, 2016, pp. 20-26. do: 10.11648/j.ajmp.s.201605040U4
Received: February 22, 2016; Accepted: March 15, 2016; Published: April 8, 2016
Abstract: The electromagnetic quantum vacuum of QED empowered with the Planck energy density is a model which comprehensively describes the origin of energy, mass, gravity and antigravity. A photon is a wave of quantum vacuum and has energy and so according to the mass-energy equivalence principle, a corresponding mass. A massive particle is a structure of quantum vacuum whose rest mass diminishes the energy density of the quantum vacuum, which generates mass and gravity. The kinetic energy of a relativistic particle originates from the quantum vacuum.
Keywords: Mass, Energy, Quantum Vacuum, Gravity, Antigravity, Higgs Mechanism, Gravitational Waves

*INTRODUCTION (1)*
In the Energy-Mass-Gravity Theory (EMG Theory), the electromagnetic dynamic quantum vacuum (DQV) intended as a super-fluid medium consisting of an enormous amount of processes of creation/annihilation of particles-antiparticles is the fundamental background which determines a unifying view of energy, mass and gravity. The DQV energy as the fundamental energy of the universe cannot be created and cannot be destroyed. DQV is a unified system governing the processes taking place in the micro and the macro world. DQV is dynamic in the sense that the presence of a given stellar object or elementary particle (or interaction) reduces the amount of the quantum vacuum energy with respect to the Planck energy density. The appearance of material objects and subatomic particles 'corresponds to changes in the quantum vacuum energy density and thus can be considered as the excited states of the same DQV. In other words, energy and matter can be seen as different forms of DQV energy. Each particle is made out of DQV energy [1 ].
A magnetic field can be seen as a wave of quantum vacuum on the surface XY, and the electric field can be seen as a wave of quantum vacuum on the surface XZ. A photon is a wave of quantum vacuum in XYZ. The fields are composed of waves of the quantum vacuum. The physical fields are not different entities with respect to the quantum vacuum: the fields are themselves physical properties of the quantum vacuum in the sense that they are excitations of quantum vacuum determined by vibrations of opportune regions corresponding to the appropriate fluctuations of the quantum vacuum energy density. Electric and magnetic fields are two different kinds of polarization of the DQV produced by the frequencies associated with the motion of the virtual particles of the creation/annihilation processes. As a consequence of the evolution of the creation/annihilation processes, namely the motion of the virtual particles-antiparticles generated in these processes, different modes of the fundamental DQV are generated, where each mode corresponds to an independent oscillation defined by the frequency produced by a specific process of creation/annihilation of quanta associated with the elementary fluctuations of the DQV.
Our vision is that the progress of physics requires respect to the physics heritage. Quantum electrodynamics. (QBD) belong to the heritage of physics. In QED the velocity of light is defined by quantum vacuum permittivity and permeability which is described by c = — — . This means
that the quantum vacuum is a concrete medium which exists in the entire universe. Planck's metrics also belong to the heritage of physics. Accordingly to the Planck metrics, each Planck volume Vp of space has an amount of Planck energy

The correctness of this statement emphasizes the incorrectness of the 3 other statements.

From: uitterdijk <sjaakenlutske@hetnet.nl> Subject: Potential energy Dear physicist, While developing a digital model for orbiting objects I once again experienced the problem with the conventional definition of potential energy. The first time was when I was writing the article: http://vixra.org/pdf/1505.0225v5.pdf ‘Why a Photon is not a Particle’.  It now turned out that the problem still hadn’t been solved. In the present version 5 the problem is definitively solved.  Applying the alternative definition of potential energy in the presented photon model, this model now shows that the magnetic energy in an atom (with one electron) equals the kinetic energy of this electron.  And it shows that this magnetic energy eventually is the source that delivers the energy of the photon. The fundamental problem of the conventional definition of potential energy is indirectly but clearly shown in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_orbital I scratched out the wrong words and wrote the correct ones behind them in italics. Orbital energy In atoms with a single electron ......., the energy of an orbital ...... is determined exclusively by n.  The n=1 orbital has the lowest highest possible energy in the atom.  Each successively higher value of n has a higher lower level of energy, but the difference decreases as n increases *.  For high n, the level of energy becomes so high low that the electron can easily escape from the atom. *          The Rydberg expression is meant here: E = hf = hc * R∞ * (1/n12 - 1/n12) Example:                         n1                     n2             (1/n12 - 1/n12)                         1                      2                      0,75                         5                      6                      0,012                         10                   11                     0,0017 The example above shows the correctness of the statement: “......but the difference decreases as n increases”.  The correctness of this statement emphasizes the incorrectness of the 3 other statements. If even such an obviously wrong description of such a simple phenomenon determines the thoughts about a fundamental property of an atom, what, for god’s-sake, might have happened more in physical science? In http://vixra.org/pdf/1709.0440v1.pdf and in the attachment you will find the background for the recovery of this fundamental mistake by means of a much more direct and common sense definition of potential energy. Kind regards,  Sjaak Uitterdijk