squeeze a marble between the palms of your hands

From: Bruce Lamar Rosenberg <brues.1@comcast.net> Subject: Seeing the universe with and without light. Joe Balint: "Inspiration comes from where I know not, but I had to get this one out of my head. Probably not the right place to pass it along so I hope to not offend anyone; "TO SEE THE ETHER Is to see Energy without light. The Ether is the medium Light is but the messenger of Energy's alternate structure called matter. If one cannot see the Ether, One cannot see this truth." Thanks Joe Balint for  the above comment on light to see aetheric motion. The light carrying motion of the aether is akin to transverse/ shear  waves in a perfectly elastic medium which interact with matter by imparting tangential energy aka spin  to electrons. To experience this, squeeze  a marble between the palms of your hands and move/shear the hands back and forth. This will cause the marble/electron to turn. On the other hand, longitudinal/compression waves will pass  through the electron/marble without imparting energy.  I guess that the LIGO gravity wave detectors have detected the longitudinal/compression waves and thus are seeing the universe without light. Best Regards, Bruce

For those who don’t want to humiliate themselves

From: uitterdijk <sjaakenlutske@hetnet.nl> Subject: The umpteenth email Dear Physicist,   You are herewith informed about the launching of my article: The Umpteenth Evidence, published at: http://vixra.org/abs/1801.0261 One of the conclusions is:   Einstein mixes up the real physical world and the measurement of it by insinuating that if the real length ‘l’ of a rod is measured by an observer moving with constant velocity relative to the rod, this measurement will differ from that real length (“...we shall find that it differs from l.”). This is in contradiction to the principle that each physical law is the same in any inertial system.   Given the mentioned principle he should have concluded that such an observation must have been carried out incorrectly.   Moreover: he effectively took an arbitrary method for his observation, read: measurement. Another conclusion, especially meant for the astronomer, is that light rays in the universe in principle don’t reach the earth with velocity c relative to earth. The real velocity is c+v, with v the velocity of the source at the moment of emission relative to the velocity of the earth at the moment of reception, both projected on the direction of the light ray.   Kind regards,   Sjaak Uitterdijk   P.S. For those who don’t want to humiliate themselves by visiting vixra the article is attached too.

the challenge confronting science today

From: Wolfgang Baer <wolf@nascentinc.com>

Subject: To all Realists

To all:
I just submitted an essay contest to FQXI that is a short version of the physics of the observer I am working on. One of the responses claims I am completely off the mark and was signed "realist" 

Some of you may have the same "realist" inclinations so think of this simple experiment:

Consider any object lens image setup.
Bend the image screen and you will see the image is distorted, but no such distortion changes the object.
Now do the same thing but use your eye as the lens image part of the setup.
 Close one eye. With the other focus on an object - say a coffee cup on the desk 1 meter away. Now push the open eye from the side with your finger. This bends the retina and also moves or distorts the coffee cup.

There is no physical mechanism in our current science that accounts for such a distortion of the coffee cup if the coffee cup you see is an independent object.

Conclusion: Neither the coffee cup nor anything we see in our daily environment is an independent objective reality. We are living in an interpretation of sensor interactions that is implemented by a physics inside the observer. Developing and defining this physics and straightening out the errors that have crept into our current physics due to the assumption that reality is the way we see it is the the the challenge confronting science today    

If you want to look at the paper click on
https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3043
If you want to rate it it might help me win, never know.

Thanks

Wolf

Dr. Wolfgang Baer
Research Director
Nascent Systems Inc.
tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
E-mail wolf@NascentInc.com

This problem could be overcome by using some small rockets.

Brief Introduction

Just like for any kind of small airlines, Helicopters, big and heavy Jet airlines or any other kind of small/big private or professional airlines; it is must to have airports and runways (small and or big) to take off the airlines/helicopters/Jets from the ground. These small/big runways help the airlines/Jets run in the ground until it prepares itself to take off from the ground and fly in the sky; this design also should be considered as a BIG RUNWAY. But this design (runway) is bigger than all those runways.

Similar to ground transportation means such as Buses, Trucks, Trains which require gears 1, 2, 3 and 4 to boost the speed or similar to those air shuttles which need huge amount of energy to take off from the ground (because they need to act against the earth gravitation and carry weight heavier than the air shuttles or buses, trucks) my design proposal may reduce the amount of energy to perform the same if implemented properly.  It could not only reduce the energy cost but it would be far less expensive, reliable, and easier to carry the human being to the space frequently, thus widening the door for passenger space shuttles in a regular basis. Another great benefit is; the space shuttles could be lunched in any unfavorable weather without any interruption throughout the year. This design is also very safe from the birds or any other interruption that may occur in an open air runway. We even may not need the fuel that we are currently using and; even if we need it; it would be very less or No at all because we will be using the electricity in this proposed design. This runway could be used to lunch not only space shuttles but flying saucers as well. My map is to be considered as a space runway or airport.

 

Goal

As today’s people are travelling to many places, cities, countries by using their own vehicles including all kinds of community ground and air transportation means and this activity is changing their way of thinking, changing their lifestyle and becoming more positive, more courageous, more enthusiastic, more productive and more imaginary, this proposed shuttle lunch design would significantly widen the entire thing because more people could travel the space more often than ever and get chance to look back their mother-place from many angles. It would help to provide easy, fast and reliable source to perform maintenance for other space shuttles that may require maintenance time to time while their space run. Because there would be more frequent space lunch than ever before it would help to carry maintenance tools in the next lunch if it was left before. So maintenance could be done more frequently. It would help to collect the garbage in the space left by other space shuttles. It would help to conduct more laboratory test which is more beneficial if it is done in the space. And most importantly when more and more human being would travel the universe frequently (because it would be very affordable, easy and comfortable) and will look back  his/her motherland, the earth, his/her thought will drastically change towards the positivity of the life and mankind, the religion, and any kind of pollution currently the world is facing. This change of thought in mankind could dramatically reduce the hatter amongst people and religion fight would be narrowed down or eliminated. The people would think more about the climate change and do their best to restore it. The people will be more excited and courageous and would try their best to develop new robust technology to further enhance the space shuttles lunch program. This will open a new era of space travel for the mankind.

 

Some Technical Points

Just like for any kind of bigger airlines (Boeings) it is must to have big airports and long runways to take off from the ground; this design also should be considered as a BIG RUNWAY. But this design (runway) is bigger than those runways, may be somewhere 60 to 90 miles long.

 

Similar to ground transportation means such as Buses, Trucks which at the start up require gears 1, 2, 3 and 4 to boost the speed smoothly and gradually or similar to those air shuttles which needs huge amount of energy to take off from the ground (because they need to act against the earth gravitation and carry weight heavier than the air shuttles or buses, trucks) my runway design proposal may reduce the amount of energy  to perform the same more efficiently, more dramatically if implemented properly. 

For this to happen, I firmly believe that the mountains must be used. It is very similar action as the fighter airlines take off from the water ship. The water ships have short runway for the fighter planes to take off but in the time of take off one side of the water ship is lift upwards (It is to remember that there were several accidents occurred when the fighter airlines were used to fly without lifting one side of the ship upwards). Exactly the same theory applies here too. The mountain and its height could help us to lift the space shuttle up to 6 - 7 kilometers easily. And it could be done in any type of weather condition because it will be done into underground runway in the mountain. The runway design would be from ground till the peak of the mountain. The space shuttle could be of any type; Capsule, Flying Saucer, Surrounded or of present type.

This runway design will be made into underground of the mountain. At the bottom of the mountain there would be a port to facilitate the shuttle lunch, maintenance and other administrative activities and other point would be towards the height of the mountain peak (6000 to 7000 meter). It would be an underground tunnel runway. The entire tunnel is to be vacuumed where the runway is made up. The shuttle will be lunched towards the peak of the mountain to reach the space from this vacuumed tunnel runway. The speed of the shuttle would be 2 to 3 Kilometer per second. The tunnel would not be made up as circled format but it will be made up as ‘Barbell’ so that enough space for shuttle lunch, administration and maintenance is available in the ground and in the peak. The shuttle will run as per electro magnet theory. The tunnel would have 4 to 6 electro magnet leeks, made to the left and right, up and down which is very similar to the train’s leeks.

The tunnel would be divided into multiple chambers, 6 to 7, and is vacuumed so that each chamber could be controlled and vacuumed separately when required. When the shuttle would run into the vacuumed tunnel runway, the front chamber would open to give a way to the shuttle and back chamber would be closed immediately so that control over each vacuumed chamber is done easily, efficiently and consistently. To open all the respective front chambers for the shuttle coping of its extremely fast speed, I think (This is my suggestion) the camera lens’ valve must be considered. This will help to match the speed of the shuttle. It will help to open the chamber when the shuttle reaches towards it and close it automatically after the shuttle passes the chamber. As soon as the shuttle passes one chamber and reaches to the next, the left behind chamber would be closed and the next front chamber would be opened automatically. This process design would be very helpful to control the vacuum system of each chambers of the tunnel.

When the shuttle would run rapidly towards the last chamber and the chamber’s valve will open to give entrance for the shuttle, a lot of air could blow in the chamber. This situation would go against the shuttle’s run and push the shuttle back. Or the vacuum could be leaked from the last chamber when it will open for the shuttle that will also ultimately prevent the shuttle to boost up its speed when it is in the peak of the mountain. Both situations could lead the shuttle reduce its speed. To overcome this problem and continue maintaining the speed of the shuttle we could use another vacuum system that is found in the breaking system of the automobiles. This vacuum system is found in the booster of the automobiles.

When the shuttle will bounce the last chamber of the vacuumed tunnel (peak of the mountain) with a speed of 2 to 3 KM per second it could travel an additional 30 to 40 second or even 1 minute extra time towards the space which could be measured somewhere 80 -100 KM distance without losing its fuel. This extra travel will be actually in addition of the height of the mountain which is somewhere between 6 to 7 KM. But at the end when the shuttle leaves the last chamber there is a possibility that the speed of the shuttle may get slow in every single second. This problem could be overcome by using some small rockets. The rockets will be triggered when the shuttle will leave the last chamber and travel 80 -100 KM additional distance without losing its fuel. This will help boost the speed of the shuttle and maintain the speed constantly.

I know NASA is a very huge organization and it will definitely evaluate every single word that I am expressing here. Moreover I don’t know a lot of other aspects of this proposed plan such as, if the rocket lunch is necessary to boost up the shuttle or not? How big and deep the tunnel must be? What will look like the electro magnetic train leak? What types of valves must be used? How many chamber we require? What will look like the design or the model of the chambers in reality? Since it is very necessary every single chamber must be opened and closed with matching the shuttle speed, I also have no idea how much speed we can get from the electro magnetic tunnel to make it happen? which chamber will need what percentage of vacuum? But I think by implementing my design we can lunch new shuttles every single day or every single week in general. It will be more efficient, easier, more reliable and more convenient.

I am just trying to put my new idea into words and believe it will work. I hope that NASA will take my idea positively and closely see each point that I have presented here. If NASA likes my idea I will follow all other necessary formalities that requires by the law and NASA’s rules and regulations. Everybody in this world looks towards of all benefits from his/her work and I am not apart but I will do every single effort to make this project happen if NASA likes my idea.

 

 

Thanks!

Pradip Kumar Bhattarai, Biratnagar NEPAL