the Alan Guth inflationary period is only a joke beside the acrobatics which needs to be invented here

HUBBLE'S LAW – FUTILITY AND ABSURDITY If you have already read this newsletter, please disregard this email. There is an active advertisement campaign which is going to be explained in another newsletter and this campaign has as purpose to resend the last important newsletters to the people who haven’t opened the email. As far the advertisement unfolds simultaneously from multiple domains, there is a delay in the actualization of unsubscribed people from various lists. Sometime it is possible to receive another email after you unsubscribed from this delivery. Do not worry though! It is important to highlight that anyone wish has to be respected, but on the other hand there are going to be clear rules and consequences for such cases. Those who have chosen to unsubscribe are going to have a late re-entry to work in the new proposed theory. The rules are going to be even harsher for those who declared this new theory spam or took other actions against it.     The newsletter should present interest to any scientist as far it deals with the foundation of future exact sciences.       Irrespective of a limited field a scientist further chooses to excel, the foundation has to be known by everyone.       There was a kick off for this topic a couple of years ago, but as result of uncountable sabotages, the right newsletter was substituted with another file and I observed this fact only a few weeks ago. It took me a bit of time to search in archives for the original newsletter posted in May 2016 and correct the situation. I still have to correct other links which are pointing to wrong files, and this is going to be done as soon as possible.       The present newsletter brings up new evidence about how laymen or pupils in science, using elementary arithmetic and geometry, can rule out the Hubble law. In fact, I think that a cartoon for children with this topic is going to have more success than a scientific article published in Nature.           The introductory part of this newsletter presents the formal and historical frame of this law. The adventure of H0 offers a possibility to see the so called Robert Kirshner`s (CFA-Harvard) principle at work. He enounced this principle in a video presentation which can be found on youtube.           ,,If you read in a navigation book it says: Do not judge the distance to a light by its brightness. The penalty of being wrong is ship wreck and death. The penalty for doing the same error in astronomy is only an erratum; eventually another paper makes the headlines of scientific mass media and offers the possibility for another rocket scientist to become a star over the night and for another night! “          The section 2 shows how simple laymen without a scientific background can make fun of the absurd consequences of this law. Hubble law has a strange characteristic which was not spotted by someone yet: it is dependent on the observer.           It is a common sense idea that distance between two galaxies has a unique value at least for the three-dimensional space we are living.           If two different observers want to obtain the same distance between two galaxies, they have to agree that the Hubble constant is different for each of them. In order to keep the validity of Hubble law, the constant H has to be adjusted (make it different) for each and any observer in the Universe. The situation becomes even more problematic if geometric aspects are taken into consideration.           If two observers apply the Hubble law for a galaxy in-between, the movement of that galaxy defies any logic: the galaxy has to move simultaneously in opposite directions.        If more observers are placed on a circle and the galaxy is in the origin of that circle, the motion of that galaxy is completely incomprehensible.         The paradox is that any individual observer will deduce a motion of the galaxy according to the Hubble law. When opposite observers are taken into consideration, the speeds of the expansions cancels out in opposite direction so … the galaxy does not move at all….         Section 3 presents how CMB photons and optical photons are stretched differently by the process of expansion and of course the discrepancy is analyzed.         In order to cope with this discrepancy, the Alan Guth inflationary period is only a joke beside the acrobatics which needs to be invented here in order to stretch a photon with 1897698 nm in only 100 millions years.        Even with a new acrobatics the new generation of instruments on Earth or in space will discover structures older than Big Bang or far away structures which needed a longer time to form than Big Bang can explain….         In fact even present discovered galaxies with redshifts between 9 and 12 will get a new face in the future. The fact they appear irregular and disorganized is merely a problem of distance and imprecise instrumentation.       If Hubble law were to be true, astronomy would become a simple problem of accounting. There are a lot of structures in the Universe which are not involved in the expansion process and a photon traveling these structures should be not redshifted.         For example a photon traveling through Virgo supercluster is not redshifted for the last 33 Mpc and by comparison another photon coming from another direction of space is going to get redshifted.     From human perspective it is impossible to make heads and tails from this situation….        Going further, the case of galaxies in collision cannot be described in a satisfactory manner by Hubble law too.        In fact some principles of astronomy have to be formulated: 1.No single case of distant galaxies in collision will be ever found in Universe, having a component redshifted and another one blueshifted. 2.At medium distances, sometimes galaxies in collision will appear to an observer as the theory predicts (one spectra blueshifted and another redshifted) and sometimes both spectra will be redshifted. 3.At low distance the theory is respected and all the time an observer measures for galaxies in collision a blueshifted and a redshifted spectra.         These principles are valid for IR, VIS, UV, Xray domains. Radio and microwave are different and they will be treated as such in the book.      Last but not least, the cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature is analyzed from the Hubble’s law perspective.      If organized matter (galaxies, clusters of galaxies, walls of galaxies) has the ,,strange property" to block the space expansion, the same particular effects should be observed for cosmic microwave background radiation too. There is no need for fine instrumentation to detect these facts: a radio amateur would be able to see this difference with his instrumentation!        For the new theory of science, Hubble law and Big Bang theory are part of the history of physics.        The last section presents a short info about the spectra displacement in the new theory of science. The link with more details: https://www.pleistoros.com/en/newsletters Best regards Sorin Cosofret

perimeter of a circle/diameter is a radical number witch is radical ten!

From: Outlook Admin <waran1976@hotmail.com>
Subject: Sci. K. V. Satheeswaran