My struggle (and survival) with a gang of intellectualcriminals is going to be considered a tragedy

From: Subject: ABOUT SPACE EXPLORATION AND QUANTUM MECHANICS - FAKING THE SCIENCE FOR PUPILS - PART VI ABOUT SPACE EXPLORATION AND QUANTUM MECHANICS- FAKING THE SCIENCE FOR PUPILS - PART VI This is the second  delivery  forthis newsletter using a secondary domain. If you and all your colleagues are receiving this information for the first time, it is highly probable thatyour institution is still blocking my principal domain. It would be better to discuss with the people in charge about this ,,problem” becausethere are going to be supplementary fees when the license is going to be asked.On the other hand, it is important that emails are opened in html format and not as text. Acyba software, which makesthis delivery possible, can make a correct statistic with people who open the emails only as html format.If you open the email in text format, I do not know that you opened the email and I keep sending the same newslettersecond or third time to you from other domains. This is annoying for you, but also, time and resource consuming for me..I am going to excuse myself in advance for those who receive the same newsletter a second time from a completelydifferent reason. If a reader opens the email late, when  the queue for the second delivery is already running, I cannot undo the process ofsending..... Thanks for  your understanding......Some circumstantial facts ,,forced” me to write about a topic I was musingfor long time, but which was postponed all the time for various reasons.  The topic indiscussion is about the latest pristine part of our planet Earth - the upper atmosphere - and how humanity can promote a sustainable spaceexploration. The aerospace industry is expanding rapidly toward a permanent presence of humanfactor in outer space and from my point of view, it is of paramount importance for the scientific community not only to assess the negative impact ofthis industry for the upper atmosphere, but to support precautionary measures and to advance some new innovative solutions too. The first section, entitled space exploration and the wild capitalism, analysis the,,hidden“ face of aerospace industry and its impact on atmosphere and especially on upper atmosphere. The chemistry of upper atmosphere is relatively stable and it makes no sense to destabilize it in order to spend other money  to fix it,in the future. I have serious doubts that aerospace industry is ever going to fix the damages they produce by burning the dirty chemicals used thesedays. Fixing a broken upper atmosphere is not so simple as one theoretician can imagine.  Not only dirty chemicals, but even water, the most ubiquitous substance on Earth surface and so essential for living organisms,  is aplague for the upper atmosphere. A wild uncontrolled and unregulated space exploration cangenerate in less than a decade bigger negative effects for life on Earth as more than a century of fossil fuels burning. Do you really want such thing to happen?UnsubscribeThe second section advances some new solutions in order to have a sustainablespace exploration. If aerospace industry wants to continue with a chemical type ofpropulsion, a switch to a nitrogen based fuel has to be mandatory. Such nitrogen based fuel, used in the right way, would have minimal or no impact onatmosphere and especially on upper atmosphere. Or maybe the space tourists are so poor and cannotafford a few hundreds bucks more for a cleaner fuel? Other technologies for escaping atmosphereare discussed too. The StarTram project was already proposed by others as a space launchsystem propelled by maglev technology using the slope of a mountain. A sustainable space exploration has to support such initiative to be implementedas soon as possible and not consider it only a theoretical possibility. In my opinion such asystem should be cheaper and easier to be assembled on a platform in the upper atmosphere. First of all in order to have a platform in the upperatmosphere, it is necessary to support this platform by flotation and helium or hydrogen balloons are the only options possible. By default hydrogen is scary because it entered in the public subconscious after theHindenburg disaster. At 40 km altitude, in the upper atmosphere, the oxygen is so scarce that a simple burning of hydrogen would take place withdifficulty, if any; to have an explosion there is out of question. In order to carry thelaunching package up to the upper atmosphere platform, helium balloons can be used as far they are safer for ascending and descending throughtroposphere and stratosphere. There is also necessary to develop some more reusable balloonsfor ascension or descent and such a prototype of a two compartment balloon is described too. The third section discus about rocket boosters and how these can be improved. Thepresent chemicals used in these boosters are true ecological bombs and they have a strong impact on stratosphere and on the ozone layer. Here there is an option of choice to switch to other cleaner chemicals or to promote acomplete new technology.UnsubscribeThe forth section changes completely the topic and presents an introductorydiscussion about the absurdities of classical quantum theory; ,,classical" because it relates to atomic structure and not to the other fields, as farnow, quantum is everywhere - after some theoreticians. For the new proposed theory,  QM has only one sure reserved place: in the dust bin ofabsurd idea collection of which moderns science is full of! Well, I think that thissection is going to become the nightmare of quantum fanatics because a simple analogy with pi irrational number is going to demolish the entirefoundation of this theory. Not one, not two, not three, but four paradoxes are presentedhere. The first paradox of QM: a quanta of energy has a variable size, but a a quanta of momentum (angular, spin, possible linear) has always a constantvalue. The second quantum paradox: the quantified motion of a particle around a center of force (in our case electron) cannot admit a continuoustrajectory. There is a third paradox of quantum mechanics too:for an electron on orbit, the angular momentum is quantified and its energy is non-quantified.during a quantum jump, the energy becomes quantified and the momentum non-quantified. The strangevariation and non-conservation of angular momentum during a quantum jump represents the forth paradox of quantum mechanics. After this introduction,there are going to be other articles about the topic soon.... In fact a newsletterabout the famous quantum computer is in progress and after the advertisement, I suppose that no sound mind would pop up to support such imbecility.Please do not confuse quantum computer imbecility with nanotechnologies, they are completely non-related or at least they would be in thefuture.  It is a pity that no one in the entire world has considered necessary to supportthe development of this theory. A famous dictator once said: A single death is a tragedy; amillion deaths is a statistic. My struggle  (and survival) with a gang of intellectualcriminals is going to be considered a tragedy; Decades of generations of youngsters, who have received a wrong and futile education, are going tobe only a statistic. The only question to be answered now is: up to what moment the society canafford such large scale experiment?  And who is going to be considered guilty? The amplitude and the extent of the disaster is going to be ,,quantified” when thebalance changes. And does someone think that an overnight change is going to solve the situation?By postponing this action toward an indefinite future, more costly and traumaticthe process is going to be!    The last section is a copy carbon from the previousnewsletter (Old game, same scene, new actors and figureheads….), because it is important for people to get in touch with the expectedunexpected... If you want to contact me please try to use the email contacts onpleistoros.com webpage. Most of the time the emails are blocked or bounced so you have to insist until you get a confirmation.  The link to this newsletter:https://www.pleistoros.com/en/newslettersSincerely, S o r i n  C e z a r    C o ș o f r e ț