The lump of two small galaxies is even more dreadful for the concept of dark matter.

 Feedback about  Sun  and Dark Matter texts 

I would like to ask for a feedback for some online published texts about astronomy.
The topic is on general interest  and therefore physicists from other fields can formulate a feedback too, because  only the conceptual models are presented. Anyway, next newsletter will cover more fields of physics in order to not get bored easily.  

Also, I grouped 2 newsletters in a single one in order to avoid multiplicity of emails.

The first text is related to the Sun Spectra and measured Doppler shift in case of Sun absorption lines.
Has someone ever truly questioned how some dark line appears in the Sun spectra ?
As far in solar atmosphere there are no temperature under 3700 K, how is possible to have the neutral absorption line of hydrogen?  How is possible to have the neutral line of Sodium, Iron, etc.
Is there a cloud of neutral matter between Sun and Earth and astronomer did not observe it?
Maybe is there some dark matter which generate our dark lines in solar spectra …
When Doppler effect and the measurements of solar rotation are analyzed the situation is even more strange ….
If this neutral matter is somewhere in solar atmosphere ... what has this to do with Sun rotation movement? Can I infer the rotation of Earth based on the movements of clouds?
More info at : 

http://www.elkadot.com/index.php/en/books/astrophysics/solar-spectra-and-doppler-shift

The second topic is related to the X ray emission from Sun
It seems that advance of scientific instrumentation give serious headaches to the theoreticians in physics. The glow of Sun in calm condition in X Ray domain was a real surprise... and few have dared to tackle with this extraordinary observation and tried to advance an explanation.
In case of solar flares and solar mass ejections, the situation is quite similar... here at least theoreticians have been trying to find a solution based on strong magnetic fields found in close surroundings. Unfortunately this is not the right Rettungsring ….
A new consistent explanation for X ray in case of Sun and a lot of stars is offered at:
http://www.elkadot.com/index.php/en/books/astrophysics/x-ray-emission-of-stars

The third text propose a new  physical model for Stars
The gaseous model of star is analyzed and in the light of new or already known information … it has to be put aside for history of physics....
A cut off experiment was even proposed in order to discriminate between these models.
Further it is analyses how the Sun compromises even the black body model both for X ray and for radio domain.
Also the differential motion of Sun is compared with differential motion of other cosmic bodies like Jupiter or Saturn, and Sun movement cannot be consistent explained by a gas model.
The link http://elkadot.com/index.php/en/books/astrophysics/new-star-model

Last topic is about dark matter... this new ether of modern science ... 

Has someone ever questioned how a dark matter distribution outside of visible disk of galaxy is able to accelerate the stars at the edge?
In order to accelerate the motion of stars, the dark matter should be crowded inside the orbit of that star.....
Has someone ever questioned if this dark matter is moving or stationary relative to the galaxy?
Both alternative are unacceptable ….If dark matter halo is stationary then tidal effects should slows the galaxy rotation. If it rotates with the normal matter in the galaxy then it should flatten out into a disk.
Although a lot of scientists argue that gravitational lensing is a proof for existence of dark matter, the opposite is true. Such halo of dark matter should perturb images of other objects in universe so strong that astronomy will became a non science. If 90 % of matter in galaxies or clusters of galaxies is concentrated in halo as dark matter, the deviation of photon by this halo is so strong and effective that all we can observe in Universe will be only false images. It is impossible for a bunch of photons coming from the far away distances to not pass through a halo of dark matter of a galaxy or a cluster of galaxies.
Further on, solely on the 1E0657-56 (bullet cluster) collision interpretation, a ,,common sense” mind will rule out the dark matter concept as internally inconsistent and contradictory.
If dark matter separates from normal matter in the process of collision, a simple situation is analysed where 2 galaxies collide under an angle .....and their dark matter go away....
The lump of two small galaxies is even more dreadful for the concept of dark matter. For this case is there a mixing of dark matter coming from initial components? If yes how is this possible, when dark matter from a colliding galaxy does not interact with dark matter from the other ? If not, how dark matter from a initial galaxy take care of ,,its own” visible matter and avoid to influence the visible matter coming from another galaxy?
The correlation of dark matter with cosmic background radiation (CMB) will make the subject of the next article and it will be published online soon. In any case, as general idea, it is preposterous to think that a variation of a million part of a degree of temperature can decide the fate of a galaxy or even of the entire Universe as the actual interpretation of CMB says. Any strange idea in a science fiction book seems more realistic than this possibility.
Last but not least, I would like to draw the attention that dark matter concept can be ruled out with other simple facts which should be observed in our Solar System.
If dark matter has the power to drag Sun with 60 km/s (difference between observed and expected), than Oort cloud and Kuiper belt should have disappeared from long time ...
In fact even planets would have been moved to another places in Galaxy .....
The solution for this problem was already available in 1995....

The link:  http://elkadot.com/index.php/en/books/astrophysics/black-matter

Best regards,
Sorin Cosofret   

It is an absolute, infinite, eternal negative continuum.

Space / Time:  Newton + SRT,  Leibniz + GRT.
==…
  Newton.
Space is an absolute concept. (!) Space would continue to exist
even if all its contents vanished.
Time is an absolute concept (!) that  “flows equably without
relation  to anything external.”
  Leibniz.
Space is a relative concept. (!) Space is not a “thing” unto itself, but
merely a web of relations among “things”. Space could no more
 exist apart from the “things” that it relates.
Time is a relative concept. (!) Time is merely a relation among events.

The debate between the Newtonians and the Leibnizians continues
 to the present day.
=====…
 My opinion.
Newton’s absolute space (!) and absolute time (!) are correct
in SRT, in the Minkowski spacetime ( in the negative 2D,
in the Pseudo Euclidian continuum.)  SRT is theory without
 gravity-mass. Without gravity-mass this spacetime continuum
 is “open - flat”. It is an absolute, infinite, eternal negative continuum.
This “Pseudo Euclidian continuum” spacetime has one negative
physical parameter: T=0K (zero vacuum).

Leibniz’s relative space (!) and relative time (!) are correct in the
GRT (gravity theory). GRT says that space and time are phenomena
of mass and energy. Every gravity system (like stars. planets) has
its own “closed - spherical” space and time that depends on its mass,
energy and speed. Therefor from Cosmic view these parameters
are relative, but for lodgers on  the planet Earth these gravity-space
and gravity- time are absolute parameters.
==…
 Conclusion.
What is the humor of debates between the Newtonians and the
 Leibnizians opponents?  The humor is: they both are right.
The Newton’s mechanics is correct in the Leibniz’s gravity world and
the Leibniz’s gravity world is correct in Newton’s absolute spacetime.
=…
 Best wishes.
 Israel Sadovnik Socratus.
===..

I bumped to a huge technical and scientific gap

USPTO Conspiracy IV

USPTO Conspiracy V – A Shameful Plot on IP Affairs 

CareFusion Corporation - Assaulting a ‘Scientific Breakthrough’  US Pat. 9,067,036 June 30, 2015, US Pat. 9,205,220 December 8, 2015 – reinvention with serious scientific flaws by lay people colluding with USPTO

Illumina - What kind of reliable company would do such a mess ignoring the Law, Ethics, IP rights, and science?

MEDTRONIC, INC. is Screwing Up Hydrology Science

MEDTRONIC, INC. is Ignoring Hydrology Science

Why is Harvard University cheating Hydrology and colluding with USPTO conspiracy?

The same invention was filed and issued twice by the same Patent Examiner:

9,121,306 - Slippery surfaces with high pressure stability, optical transparency, and self-healing characteristics:

Primary Examiner: Ewald; Maria Veronica - Assistant Examiner: Auer; Laura

9,121,307 - Slippery surfaces with high pressure stability, optical transparency, and self-healing characteristics:

Primary Examiner: Ewald; Maria Veronica - Assistant Examiner: Johnson; Nancy

Does it mean that the same thing can be invented twice by the same inventor? 

Did the inventor cite herself in the other patent as reference about the present status in the art?

Did the Examiner find that a similar invention was also filed and approved by herself?

What would happen if the same reinvention had different inventors and/or different dates?

Is it possible to reinvent the same thing varying inventors and/or dates?

Is it a new Theory of Knowledge that we can reach invention^n on many folding dimensions of creation?

I am a scientist, but did I miss anything during my PhD regarding Philosophy of Science?

‘It was double charged, double paid, and who knows, double invented . . . . most probably double cheated!’

Why is Stanford University cheating Hydrology?

Power vs. Knowledge

(https://youtu.be/oq5_2LMFTlM) – disclosing a New Science

Henry Darcy in 1856 proposed the Darcy’s Law for Hydraulic Conductivity on porosity addressing fluid flow through a cross sectional area by time (volume/area/time) as ‘the velocity of the flow is proportional to the hydraulic gradient’. Afterwards in 1907 Edgard Buckingham suggested a change in the equation to address Unsaturated Hydraulic Flow, as the negative pressure upward against gravity (Soil Physics, Jury et al., 1991, John Wiley). It has been observed that many inventors and scientists employing the terminology ‘wick/wicking’ neither understand the functioning of oil lamps nor Hydrogeology in their libraries, concerning the functioning of Hydraulic Zones. They come up with scientific flaws as wicks only have negative hydraulic flow (unsaturated). Wick is a porous flexible structure resistant to fire that moves fuel toward a flame (Unsaturated Hydraulic Flow) in order to comply with its Etymology it must also resist to high temperatures of flames. It becomes a very basic Etymological flaw to call something as a wick that fails as wick on oil lamps. Then, it is impossible to contrive a wick that cannot perform as a wick. Even more, wicks could never be used as a draining porosity under saturated conditions which is not that easily handled by lay people missing deep comprehension on Hydraulic Zones interplay. After all, wicks never worked in the bottom of oil lamps and it was initially meant to constantly supply fluid under demand to a flame with a very clear hydraulic functioning.

It is a blatant mistake by any faculty handling ‘microfluidic devices’ ignoring the science of fluids – Hydrology and the Law.

Comprehension of American Academic Values

On a pursue of a ‘scientific breakthrough’ I bumped to a huge technical and scientific gap lasting more than a century also associated to an ongoing sort of conspiracy in the patenting system regarding intellectual property affairs as a blatant reinvention scheme is taking place sometimes with flawed patents. USPTO deliberately assigs lay Examiners to judge issues they are not know in the art in combination with outrageous multiple applications of the same invention as it were possible to invent the same thing over and over. The distortion is so evident that in the cover up USPTO does not disclose the technical background of Patent Examiners to assure that they are judging issues within their skill boundaries. Patent Examiners are judging issues and hiding their technical expertise. On their intellectual acumen scientists are engaged with disclosing Nature principles making them also very sensitive to perceive coherence on human affairs since we are part of Nature as well. Scientists learn about Theory of Knowledge and Metaphysics of existence just to know what can be known.

Academic Pillage on Hydrology Science

https://youtu.be/oq5_2LMFTlM

https://youtu.be/czv2OiiC5wA - MY SCIENTIFIC REWARD

Indeed I cannot receive any Nobel Prize Award. Mr. Alfred Nobel also was blessed by nature in his lab as it exploded in Sweden when he was developing the Chemistry of explosives coined as the father of Dynamite. He became famous and wealthy helping governments making more efficient wars decimating millions of humans with more efficient explosives. He neither got married nor left any offspring to keep his DNA on human genetic pool. It seems that in the deep underlying principles there is nothing noble but depressing to noble prizes that mismatch with hummingbirds.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMNBRgrZSYw                      HYDROTECHNOLOGY - A New Science

Roche - Understanding Terror inside US Government I  US  Pat. 9,063,038 June 23, 2015

CareFusion Corporation - Assaulting a ‘Scientific Breakthrough’  US  Pat. 9,067,036 June 30, 2015

Illumina - What kind of reliable company would do such a mess ignoring the Law, Ethics, IP rights, and science?

Stanford University, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

University of Washington:  I, II.., XII

UCONN:  I, II, …, XIV

Cornell:  I, II.., XXX

Univ. of Maryland: I, II, III

SUNNY:  I, II, III, IV

Carnegie Mellon I, II, III, IV, V

UC Santa Barbara I, II, III

Princeton University I, II, III, IV          

MIT is Cheating Science I, II

Wicking Mob – Harvard University

USPTO Conspiracy I 

USPTO Conspiracy II

USPTO Conspiracy III

USPTO Conspiracy IV

USPTO Conspiracy V – A Shameful Plot on IP Affairs 

Hydrology Breakthrough vs. USPTO Conspiracy and Brainwashing

‘...  If you have a point to make about my treatment of hydrological concepts, I ask that you take the time to explain your specific points of disagreement.  I note that my work is better represented in my publications (available at http://www.stroockgroup.org/home/publications​) than in patents, as the lawyers have been translated the latter into legalese that I do not understand.’

a boa was born from an egg. Infinitely small egg.

God-Creator of our Universe is 0-Zero! and at the same time - Infinity! Zero creates Infinity. it is high time to discover this mistery for all mankind!
Are You agree?

   What tells us Light velocity about? About unity of Space-Time-Substance and even our Soul!
       It is very strange,that nobody noticed it!
                                                                                my best regards!
                                                                                                       From Russia with Love!Stanislaw 

Dear friends. In all textbooks of physics there is a scheme of transformations of Lorentz and reduction 

length of object at motion. Simple chart and simple formula. The formula of relativistic addition of 

speeds is very simple too. But why nowhere is a scheme for it?  But it is yet simpler! Here it is. 

Let us suppose, speed of the first object relatively external observer is determined as relation segment  

BC  to the segment AB .  It is a red triangle. 

 Segment    AB   – its own time.

Segment  BC  - its  own way.

V1 – velocity of the first

object.

V1 =  ВС            АВ    

(all triangles – rectangular)

Speed of the second object relatively first one is determined as attitude of segment  CD toward the 

segment  СА. It is a green triangle. Segment  СА   is its own time. Segment CD is its own way

                                                          V2 =  CD              CA                    

Then total speed of two objects relatively external observer will be equal to attitude  segment  BD 

toward the segment  ВE . It is a blue triangle

                                                           V =   BD             ВE     

It easily to make sure, that on such chart of addition of speeds total speed will fully correspond to the 

relativistic formula

                                                                               V2    +    V2

                                                            V =                                                  

                                                                                 1 + V1 × V2      C2

How is it possible, to explain this unusual chart? Let us have a look at it by child's eyes. As talked Antoine 

de Saint-Exupery -,,Only a child can see on the picture of hat, the elephant eaten by a snake.

Do you remember the animated cartoon about a boa that wanted to measure its own length? Beasts in-

field wanted to help him. But they did not could. They did not have a measure line. But suddenly a wise 

monkey offered original solution. To measure length of boa in parrots. Boa length = 25 parrots. It turned 

out. But what to do, if there is not a parrot? In general. Round nobody and nothing is present!  A boa is 

lonely in space. There is one exit to him. To measure the length in…  boas. As a measure to use boa 

itself. Then measure unit will be a 1 boa.  He can draw out a neck. To draw out a tail. It nothing will 

change. A boa always will be equal to itself. His own length always will seem to him as measure unit. Let 

us imagine an one-dimensional boa in the two-dimensional space-time, that wanted to see the tag of 

own tail. While he lies horizontally ,it does not see the tail, and  it does not feel the time. The first span 

of time will appear by the first motion of boa.

                                                                                                                                                                                      

While there is no the motion, there is no a time. A space size is not certain defined too. Distance from a 

tail to the head in unidimensional space that is set by two points A and B is not determined. It is simply. 

The first span of time appears only by the first motion. And boa must lift a head, to see its tail.  He sees 

the tail in the distance  AC . It measures this distance on a relation

to itself. More precisely to that part of itself, that remained

in place. It is    АВ  . In fact he can not see   CB  . Thus his head was moved to distance  BC  .

Three points - А.В.C  must communicate between

each other, being the tops of triangle of

Pythagoras. 

In this case at determined length of jump of head, the square of triangle will be maximal and always 

equal to the integer (natural number).  Then a size reversed to the area of triangle will be minimum. 

Here we must remember about principle of Pierre de Fermat, and quantum principle of energy. We 

accept it as a postulate and (a priori) we lean against it.

And we see. If the head of boa was moved to  4/5 from his horizontal part, then distance from a head to 

the tail became  3/5.  It seems to him,that his length became less in accordance with the theory of 

relativity

                     L = L0            1 – V2/C2       =  L0           1  – (4/5)2      =  L0 3/5

 A boa can how pleasingly close approach a head to the tail, but he will be never able to bite itself for a tail! In 

fact, if it will bite, it will seem to him, that his length became equal to the zero, area of triangle, that he 

embraces by body will disappear too, and a size reversed to it will become endless. 

Let us imagine, that a boa was born from an egg. Infinitely small egg. It is situated in the point  А.  A little time 

after it,the second boa was born and decided to help an elder brother to see a tail closer. A tail for them is 

common.

The second (green) boa

 moved with speed

CD/СA  relatively tail.   

 He can to turn its neck

only in the teeth of  

 the first boa.

Only at such co-operation, boas can see each other and its common tail. If the first boa wants to define 

their total speed, he needs to combine his head with the head of brother.      

 But then, to see the its own tail, he must extend it out to point Е. Head and tail can co-operate and see 

each other only

then, when they form a triangle of

 Pythagoras. This fact 

we accept

as an experimental fact (a priori).

Leaning against a postulate

constancy of light velocity.

The total

speed of two heads will be  BD/BE . As well as it must to be. In according to the formula of relativistic 

addition of speeds.

    Now it is clear, why velocity of light does not depend on speed of observer, and space & time are 

interchangeable and izotropic. How it is possible to develop this chart? 

The area of these triangles can be bound to the scalar sizes. To mass, energy, entropy etc. 

Maybe,anybody will be able discover it?

By the way. About entropy. For the first simplest motion a boa has two variants only. The simplest 

triangle of Pythagoras has parties 3,4,5. Consequently.A boa can jump on distance 3 or 4. The bit of 

information appears with this first motion. In reality, a primary bit appeared already then, when a boa 

was born from an egg.An egg is a mathematical point. It had a choice.To exist or no.To be or not to be.It 

is the first bit. Well. It decided to be. Further.It was lost in thoughts.To exist as a point or to divide on 

two points. It decided to divided in half.To create a segment.Element of unidimensional space. It is the 

second bit. A segment was thoughtful.To remain as a segment or to create from itself a triangle.Element 

of two-dimensional space-time.It is the third bit.So,there is the first byte.

What does constancy of velocity of light tell us about? Space-time-substance-information (and even 

consciousness!) form something single.Unity! There is a thing in itself!

As it applies to Creation of the World,the primary point is that Spirit that created Universe. This particle 

of Universal Spirit lives in each of us. Everybody can close eyes.Not to present visual and voice 

characters.To think nothing.Such state in a buddhism is named,,nirvana,,. After this moment, one can to 

imagine a bright point, segment,triangle etc. Not beginning to think about it, we will create information. 

Did not the Creator create the Universe and dissolved in each of us in such way?

 Mathematical point -it is Zero. A zero creates all numbers according to formula of Euler

                  0 = 1 + е iπ = 1 +  (1 – π2/2! + π4/4! – π6/6! + … ) + i(π – π3/3! + π5/5! – π/7! + …) 

In turn 

In same queue

                    π = 4/1 – 4/3 + 4/5 - 4/7 + 4/9  - …                     e = 1 + 1/1! + 1/2! + 1/3! + … 

   All numbers. Irrationals. Transcendentals. Imaginaries.All of them it is possible to express through 

naturals ones.

   May be it is Big Bang? Universe Creation! Birth of all numbers from Zero.Do you remember, what tell 

us Pythagoras? 

-,, All is a number!,,-     How? In which way?   The simplest elementary figure in three-dimensional space  

is a tetrahedron.  

  4 verges (sides) are the elements of plane (two-dimensional space). 6 ribs are the elements of line 

(unidimensional space). 4 tops are points (elements of space of a zero-dimensional space (measuring). 

Therefore. Tetrahedron gives us numbers – 4,6,4       Consider their correlation      4/6/4

Let us simplify this correlation.      4/6/4 = 2/3/2         Let us add these correlations together.   2+3+2=7

Such, in simplest case, number 7 can show itself up in space. In our world there is the simplest particle 

that a man notices. it is a quantum.  May be a quantum make itself as a number 7? To be more 

exactly,number 7 seems to us as photon.

 And a man is number too? Very large one. 

Numbers add with each other,multiply,take the logarithm et cetera. Create new numbers.And we (being 

also a numbers) perceive it all as our Universe.

 In fact, if to be thoughtful about the structure of matter, one can to go mad. Between stars there is 

emptiness. Stars co-operate with each other by the fields. Of what the gravitational field consists is clear 

to nobody. Gravitons particles are not found.Further.Have a look on an atom.Between a kernel,nucleons 

and electrons there is giant emptiness.Further. If it will turn out electrons and nucleons are 

complex,component particles also, it is possible boldly to say that between particles which they are 

made, again giant emptiness.What do we consist of?  Of emptiness, emptiness, emptiness.

Clever scientists with clever faces draw clever formulas.But nobody can say where Universe born from, 

we ourselves and time itself. From where (or from Whom) such connection between everything and all 

in Universe? May be better to acknowledge that Pythagoras is right? And all will become clear.

There is an interesting task to solve.Connection of human being with macro, micro and 

megacosm.Connection of our soul with the Soul of Creator.In respect of material side of question, it 

already is almost decided. All world physical constants ideally befit for creation of human body.At the 

change of one of them on small part, biological life will be impossible.Magnetic field of Earth.

Acceleration of the free falling on a surface.  Level of natural radiation. Etc. It is not needed even to talk 

for chemical composition of biosphere.All is created for us. Sweet ones. Who did it create? The 

anthropocentrism of Universe already for all is clear. 

Anthropocentrical is three-dimensionalness of space. In four-dimension space, five etc. the steady orbits 

of planets in Space and orbitals of electrons in atom are impossible. Topological knots are impossible.On 

that living organisms are formed. In two-dimensional space nothing is possible too.

What is remained? To explain our emotional sphere as a part of the Universe.

Here we have business with a great number surprizing facts. For example. What most span of time can 

fix man without technical equipments? Using itself and visible Universe as a clock. Correctly. One year. 

Appearance of Canicula is at dawn in the rays of an ascending Sun.It is one time per a year.This was used 

by Egyptians for the prediction of overflow of Nile.Days of solstices and equinoxes.

Let us imagine that for counting out the time a man can use his own organism only. Brain as adding 

machine.He can mark every year, charging one cell of the brain.One neuron.There are 14 milliards of 

them. So much years a man can mark on his biological accounts (clock).But Universe has a just the same 

radius.  14 milliards of light years. How is an illusion of continuous motion created in our consciousness 

by view of static discrete pictures? Stroboscopical effect.On it the cinema is based.On inertia of our sight 

(visuognosis). Duration of maintenance of the eye phose is 0,14 second. Maximal distance that man can 

pass on a line is a 40 thousand  km Round Earth.

Let us imagine a photographer that wants to make the cinema,using a photocamera only.He is making 

an instantaneous picture.He is sending it  on a cable round earth to himself.In the moment of receipt 

the first picture photographer is making the second picture etc. The time of travelling one picture round 

Earth will be 1,33 second. Very close to the sluggishness of sight.A photographer from separate pictures 

at a speed of 8 shots in a second will see the cinema. Human eye, looking on horizon can see 20 

thousand points separately.If we will look at the edge of Universe and will see these points there, then 

distance between them will be 2 million light years.Exactly on such distance from us there is the most 

distant space object visible with a naked eye. It is fog of Andromeda.

Such entertaining examples it is possible to find a great great number.They point on a question. Why our  

biological characteristics are exactly such? Why do they so exactly coincide with the parameters of 

Space? With heartfelt-physics properties of our soul  question is far more difficult. 

Physicists noticed a long ago, that in experiments behavior of elementary particles often depends on the 

presence of observer. It compels them with large labour to come to understanding of connection 

between consciousness and matter. Well. Where is that genius that will manage to show it?!

,,May be able to comprehend with all saints what is the breadth,and length,and depth,and height,,-

The Saint Paul

3: 52. When Jesus - and there will be the peace to him! - was sent, he called the people to the just way 

of Allah. Majority from them did not respond to his appeal. Seeing it, he appealed to them, asking: "Who 

will be my helpers on a way Lord"? Apostles that came to believe in Allah and in him answered: "We are 

your supporters, we support you, because you call us to the way of Allah. We came to believe in Allah. 


Witness, that we are sincerely devoted to Allah and to the just way of Allah.