Feedback about Sun and Dark Matter texts
I would like to ask for a feedback for some online published texts about astronomy.
The topic is on general interest and therefore physicists from other fields can formulate a feedback too, because only the conceptual models are presented. Anyway, next newsletter will cover more fields of physics in order to not get bored easily.
The topic is on general interest and therefore physicists from other fields can formulate a feedback too, because only the conceptual models are presented. Anyway, next newsletter will cover more fields of physics in order to not get bored easily.
Also, I grouped 2 newsletters in a single one in order to avoid multiplicity of emails.
The first text is related to the Sun Spectra and measured Doppler shift in case of Sun absorption lines.
Has someone ever truly questioned how some dark line appears in the Sun spectra ?
As far in solar atmosphere there are no temperature under 3700 K, how is possible to have the neutral absorption line of hydrogen? How is possible to have the neutral line of Sodium, Iron, etc.
Is there a cloud of neutral matter between Sun and Earth and astronomer did not observe it?
Maybe is there some dark matter which generate our dark lines in solar spectra …
When Doppler effect and the measurements of solar rotation are analyzed the situation is even more strange ….
If this neutral matter is somewhere in solar atmosphere ... what has this to do with Sun rotation movement? Can I infer the rotation of Earth based on the movements of clouds?
More info at :
The first text is related to the Sun Spectra and measured Doppler shift in case of Sun absorption lines.
Has someone ever truly questioned how some dark line appears in the Sun spectra ?
As far in solar atmosphere there are no temperature under 3700 K, how is possible to have the neutral absorption line of hydrogen? How is possible to have the neutral line of Sodium, Iron, etc.
Is there a cloud of neutral matter between Sun and Earth and astronomer did not observe it?
Maybe is there some dark matter which generate our dark lines in solar spectra …
When Doppler effect and the measurements of solar rotation are analyzed the situation is even more strange ….
If this neutral matter is somewhere in solar atmosphere ... what has this to do with Sun rotation movement? Can I infer the rotation of Earth based on the movements of clouds?
More info at :
http://www.elkadot.com/index.
The second topic is related to the X ray emission from Sun
It seems that advance of scientific instrumentation give serious headaches to the theoreticians in physics. The glow of Sun in calm condition in X Ray domain was a real surprise... and few have dared to tackle with this extraordinary observation and tried to advance an explanation.
In case of solar flares and solar mass ejections, the situation is quite similar... here at least theoreticians have been trying to find a solution based on strong magnetic fields found in close surroundings. Unfortunately this is not the right Rettungsring ….
A new consistent explanation for X ray in case of Sun and a lot of stars is offered at:
http://www.elkadot.com/index.
The third text propose a new physical model for Stars
The gaseous model of star is analyzed and in the light of new or already known information … it has to be put aside for history of physics....
A cut off experiment was even proposed in order to discriminate between these models.
Further it is analyses how the Sun compromises even the black body model both for X ray and for radio domain.
Also the differential motion of Sun is compared with differential motion of other cosmic bodies like Jupiter or Saturn, and Sun movement cannot be consistent explained by a gas model.
The link http://elkadot.com/index.php/
The second topic is related to the X ray emission from Sun
It seems that advance of scientific instrumentation give serious headaches to the theoreticians in physics. The glow of Sun in calm condition in X Ray domain was a real surprise... and few have dared to tackle with this extraordinary observation and tried to advance an explanation.
In case of solar flares and solar mass ejections, the situation is quite similar... here at least theoreticians have been trying to find a solution based on strong magnetic fields found in close surroundings. Unfortunately this is not the right Rettungsring ….
A new consistent explanation for X ray in case of Sun and a lot of stars is offered at:
http://www.elkadot.com/index.
The third text propose a new physical model for Stars
The gaseous model of star is analyzed and in the light of new or already known information … it has to be put aside for history of physics....
A cut off experiment was even proposed in order to discriminate between these models.
Further it is analyses how the Sun compromises even the black body model both for X ray and for radio domain.
Also the differential motion of Sun is compared with differential motion of other cosmic bodies like Jupiter or Saturn, and Sun movement cannot be consistent explained by a gas model.
The link http://elkadot.com/index.php/
Last topic is about dark matter... this new ether of modern science ...
Has someone ever questioned how a dark matter distribution outside of visible disk of galaxy is able to accelerate the stars at the edge?
In order to accelerate the motion of stars, the dark matter should be crowded inside the orbit of that star.....
Has someone ever questioned if this dark matter is moving or stationary relative to the galaxy?
Both alternative are unacceptable ….If dark matter halo is stationary then tidal effects should slows the galaxy rotation. If it rotates with the normal matter in the galaxy then it should flatten out into a disk.
Although a lot of scientists argue that gravitational lensing is a proof for existence of dark matter, the opposite is true. Such halo of dark matter should perturb images of other objects in universe so strong that astronomy will became a non science. If 90 % of matter in galaxies or clusters of galaxies is concentrated in halo as dark matter, the deviation of photon by this halo is so strong and effective that all we can observe in Universe will be only false images. It is impossible for a bunch of photons coming from the far away distances to not pass through a halo of dark matter of a galaxy or a cluster of galaxies.
Further on, solely on the 1E0657-56 (bullet cluster) collision interpretation, a ,,common sense” mind will rule out the dark matter concept as internally inconsistent and contradictory.
If dark matter separates from normal matter in the process of collision, a simple situation is analysed where 2 galaxies collide under an angle .....and their dark matter go away....
The lump of two small galaxies is even more dreadful for the concept of dark matter. For this case is there a mixing of dark matter coming from initial components? If yes how is this possible, when dark matter from a colliding galaxy does not interact with dark matter from the other ? If not, how dark matter from a initial galaxy take care of ,,its own” visible matter and avoid to influence the visible matter coming from another galaxy?
The correlation of dark matter with cosmic background radiation (CMB) will make the subject of the next article and it will be published online soon. In any case, as general idea, it is preposterous to think that a variation of a million part of a degree of temperature can decide the fate of a galaxy or even of the entire Universe as the actual interpretation of CMB says. Any strange idea in a science fiction book seems more realistic than this possibility.
Last but not least, I would like to draw the attention that dark matter concept can be ruled out with other simple facts which should be observed in our Solar System.
If dark matter has the power to drag Sun with 60 km/s (difference between observed and expected), than Oort cloud and Kuiper belt should have disappeared from long time ...
In fact even planets would have been moved to another places in Galaxy .....
The solution for this problem was already available in 1995....
In order to accelerate the motion of stars, the dark matter should be crowded inside the orbit of that star.....
Has someone ever questioned if this dark matter is moving or stationary relative to the galaxy?
Both alternative are unacceptable ….If dark matter halo is stationary then tidal effects should slows the galaxy rotation. If it rotates with the normal matter in the galaxy then it should flatten out into a disk.
Although a lot of scientists argue that gravitational lensing is a proof for existence of dark matter, the opposite is true. Such halo of dark matter should perturb images of other objects in universe so strong that astronomy will became a non science. If 90 % of matter in galaxies or clusters of galaxies is concentrated in halo as dark matter, the deviation of photon by this halo is so strong and effective that all we can observe in Universe will be only false images. It is impossible for a bunch of photons coming from the far away distances to not pass through a halo of dark matter of a galaxy or a cluster of galaxies.
Further on, solely on the 1E0657-56 (bullet cluster) collision interpretation, a ,,common sense” mind will rule out the dark matter concept as internally inconsistent and contradictory.
If dark matter separates from normal matter in the process of collision, a simple situation is analysed where 2 galaxies collide under an angle .....and their dark matter go away....
The lump of two small galaxies is even more dreadful for the concept of dark matter. For this case is there a mixing of dark matter coming from initial components? If yes how is this possible, when dark matter from a colliding galaxy does not interact with dark matter from the other ? If not, how dark matter from a initial galaxy take care of ,,its own” visible matter and avoid to influence the visible matter coming from another galaxy?
The correlation of dark matter with cosmic background radiation (CMB) will make the subject of the next article and it will be published online soon. In any case, as general idea, it is preposterous to think that a variation of a million part of a degree of temperature can decide the fate of a galaxy or even of the entire Universe as the actual interpretation of CMB says. Any strange idea in a science fiction book seems more realistic than this possibility.
Last but not least, I would like to draw the attention that dark matter concept can be ruled out with other simple facts which should be observed in our Solar System.
If dark matter has the power to drag Sun with 60 km/s (difference between observed and expected), than Oort cloud and Kuiper belt should have disappeared from long time ...
In fact even planets would have been moved to another places in Galaxy .....
The solution for this problem was already available in 1995....
Best regards,
Sorin Cosofret
Sorin Cosofret
No comments:
Post a Comment