Moon, its radio and microwave emission and blackbody model
Moon... a simple piece of matter without atmosphere, without a magnetic field, without a internal structure, without performing relativistic acrobacies, without anything special.... but the same Moon has something which overthrow the entire edifice of modern science: its surface is able to get the properties of a radio station and emmits partially polarised radio and microwaves, after a warming up illumination from Sun. Its behavior is quite similar to those old fashioned triodes and other electronic tubes which needed a warming time before letting the current to pass through. This behavior contradicts quite everything we have accepted in thermodynamics, quantum theory and even electricity...But who cares...!?
A comparison between Moon behavior and blackbody predictions shows that:
- The amount of radio and microwave emitted by full Moon should be about four times greater than new Moon; in reality the measurements show a difference of about 10%.
- The radio and microwave emission should be completely non-polarized; in measurements a partial polarization is observed.
- The mechanism and location of radio and microwave emission is different from infrared emission; the infrared emission is produced by outer layer of lunar material and the ,,radio and microwave” emission is generated by inner layer of lunar materials. Not only the temperature amplitude variation in microwave was different as scale, but the maximum of radio radiation was found about 3.5 days after the maximum of the surface temperature at full moon, measured by infrared techniques.
Proposed interpretation:
Generally speaking, the emission in radio and microwave has nothing to do with blackbody radiation. The illuminated surface of Moon becomes a source of radio waves and microwaves partially polarized after a certain time from the beginning of illumination (a warming up time necessary) and this emission has other causes.
First of all, we have to rule out the actual explanation published in scientific literature. Even in case some microwave and radio wave come from Sun and hit the moon surface, the lunar material cannot become a secondary source of microwave and radio waves. As was already presented in the second postulate of a new theory of thermodynamics, there is no thermal equilibrium between radio and microwave radiation and matter. When radio or microwave radiation is absorbed by matter (surface or subsurface layer), this is converted into thermal motion. Of course a cut off experiment can be proposed and performed in laboratory: absorbed microwave in matter will always generate only a change in temperature depending on the amount of microwave absorbed.
The real cause of Moon emission in radio and microwave is due to the thermal stress generated by Sun illumination. The upper layer of lunar material upon heating by Sun has the possibility to dilate, but the inner layers suffer a constricted dilatation; the reverse effect takes place during lunar night.
This is a new effect which needs a thorough study and this will be made in the near future. The generation of radio waves by materials under stress it is not a completely new phenomenon. In a 2003 study about Earthquakes in Greece, Eftaxias et. al. showed that during strong earthquakes, radio waves in kHz and MHz domain are generated and the intensity of the radio emission of seismic origin increased as the square of the wavelength. As consequence, a simple dependency of emmisivity with square of the wavelength is not a fingerprint for a blackbody radiation and can have other grounds.
Conclusions:
- As already presented in previous texts, blackbody theoretical model needs a serious revision and no blackbody has a radio or microwave emmision;
- Moon emission in radio and microwave is caused by a thermal stress caused by Sun and this effect needs to be studied.
- The temperature measurements with microwave or radio wave does not represent a reliable method. The fact that in some cases the measured temperature is close to the real one is only a question of luck or coincidence and not the result of a precise analytical tool; further studies will break this link between a temperature value and a measurement of a radio or microwave flux.
The link:
In order to avoid multiplicity of emails, here is another newsletter published already in December 2015.
Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation or how billions are spent for nothing...
Has someone ever tried to measure how much radio and microwave are emitted by a cooled body in laboratory conditions?
The cost of the experiment is about 1000 euro and it was performed quite a decade ago and already published on site and in a previous book .The results are completely negative on the entire interval of actual radio and microwave electromagnetic waves.
The cost of the experiment is about 1000 euro and it was performed quite a decade ago and already published on site and in a previous book .The results are completely negative on the entire interval of actual radio and microwave electromagnetic waves.
Has someone ever tried to measure how much radio and microwave are emitted by a cooled body in cosmic conditions?
In astronomy, the experiment can be replicated as a student task and it can be proven than other cosmic bodies do not fit to a black-body - it means at cooling do not emit radio and microwave. I have made the experiment for Moon more than a decade ago, but with actual devices even for Mercury the replicate of the experiment is a piece of cake. The experiment was intended to detect the shift of emission for Moon from IR toward radio and microwave in correlation with Sun illumination.
The conclusion is again astonishing and straightforward: a cooled cosmic body does not want to emit radio or microwave defying the black body model.
The conclusion is again astonishing and straightforward: a cooled cosmic body does not want to emit radio or microwave defying the black body model.
In order to avoid future meaningless and expensive experiment it is necessary to present some new concepts from the new theory of thermodynamics and of course the new theory of magneticity.
Postulate 1: It is impossible to produce electromagnetic waves (radio, microwaves, ) by any kind of thermodynamic experiments.
As consequence the observed cosmic microwave background radiation has nothing to do with a previous hot state of the universe and by sure this fact rule out the idea of an early big bang event. The actual accepted idea that interstellar and galactic medium with a temperature of 2,7 K, has a maximum emission in microwave radiation is a fake, and the discussion was made in Relativity book published in 2009. With actual technique, it is very easy to cool down a body up to that temperature and to measure the microwave emission of such body, and of course the result will be negative.
Postulate 2: It is impossible to have a thermal equilibrium between radio, microwave radiation and matter.
For a common sense mind the postulate is straightforward: as soon the radio or microwave source stops to emit, the radiation dissapiers immediately. It is not important at what temperature the matter has arrived or other conditions. How much microwave was released when you opened the door of an microwave oven when the source was already closed? You had to be careful to the infrared radiation emitted by the body inside microwave oven and not at microwave.....
Some cut off experiments will be described in the thermodynamic book beside a detailed description of this postulate.
For a common sense mind the postulate is straightforward: as soon the radio or microwave source stops to emit, the radiation dissapiers immediately. It is not important at what temperature the matter has arrived or other conditions. How much microwave was released when you opened the door of an microwave oven when the source was already closed? You had to be careful to the infrared radiation emitted by the body inside microwave oven and not at microwave.....
Some cut off experiments will be described in the thermodynamic book beside a detailed description of this postulate.
On the other hand, if astronomers had been a bit more mindful with some simple data, by sure the the big bang model of Universe wouldn't have been accepted.
If we leave aside the up presented new information, solely on available information published in popularization books and leaflets about big bang model of Universe, a ,,common sense” mind will rule it out as internally inconsistent and contradictory.
Here are only few new paradoxes to be explained by big bang theoreticians....
I pointed out only a few because there is no need to spend another precious time on dead horses....
If we leave aside the up presented new information, solely on available information published in popularization books and leaflets about big bang model of Universe, a ,,common sense” mind will rule it out as internally inconsistent and contradictory.
Here are only few new paradoxes to be explained by big bang theoreticians....
I pointed out only a few because there is no need to spend another precious time on dead horses....
Paradox 1. Inflation and space expansion
It is accepted that space expansion does not take place in galaxies and clusters of galaxies, becausegravitational force somehow restricts this space expansion.
If this is the situation, the ,,inflation period” who took place short after big bang is a complete non sense. The entire matter of the universe we see today, was at the time of inflation so crowded and confined in an minuscule space thatgravitational force was by sure much higher as we see in this moment in galaxies and clusters of galaxies. In order to have such ,,inflation” working we have to suppose thatgravitational force was not working during this period of inflation and this will lead to other absurdities.....
It is accepted that space expansion does not take place in galaxies and clusters of galaxies, becausegravitational force somehow restricts this space expansion.
If this is the situation, the ,,inflation period” who took place short after big bang is a complete non sense. The entire matter of the universe we see today, was at the time of inflation so crowded and confined in an minuscule space thatgravitational force was by sure much higher as we see in this moment in galaxies and clusters of galaxies. In order to have such ,,inflation” working we have to suppose thatgravitational force was not working during this period of inflation and this will lead to other absurdities.....
Paradox 2. Matter agglomerations and space expansion
If organized matter ( galaxies, clusters of galaxies, walls of galaxies) has the ,,strange property " to block the space expansion, then some particular effects should be observed for microwave and even for light coming from long distances.
In these condition Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation must has have a strong dependency with the direction where is coming from …...
Another problem which has to be solved regards the distance a CMB traveled through different ,,percentages” of expanded space. As far for some CMB, measuread in different directions, space between their origin and Earth expanded more than for other, the horizon limit is not a sphere, and it must have a different shape.
In these condition Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation must has have a strong dependency with the direction where is coming from …...
Another problem which has to be solved regards the distance a CMB traveled through different ,,percentages” of expanded space. As far for some CMB, measuread in different directions, space between their origin and Earth expanded more than for other, the horizon limit is not a sphere, and it must have a different shape.
Paradox 3 Expansion bubbles and Hubble Law
The existence of these islands inside observable universe without space expansion rule out the Hubble relation and it can be demonstrated that measured distances across Universe are meaningless and flawed.
The existence of these islands inside observable universe without space expansion rule out the Hubble relation and it can be demonstrated that measured distances across Universe are meaningless and flawed.
A simple example is provided...
The link:
Best Wishes for the Holiday Season!
Sorin Cosofret
So do people like this dude just spam physicists' inboxes or something?
ReplyDelete