Wednesday, November 23, 2016

My birthday is 24 November 1985

From: abdorahman sharifzadeh <sharifzadeh.8a@gmail.com>
Subject: The Path Correction

In the name of Allah

Dear professor, I am Abdurrahman Sharifzadeh. I have written a book. Its name is The Path Correction. Not wasting your time, I have separated the important parts of the book into four files: pdf 1, pdf 2, pdf 3 and pdf 4. You need a very short time to read them. Please read them. If you enjoyed those four files,please read file 5 too. Dear professor I don’t know how to write an email to a professor. My English is bad and I haven’t time to learn. So please accept my apologies. Thank you very much.

I have tried to quote the exact text of the original book but sometimes, I either did not have the original book or finding the intended text from the original book was time-consuming. So, I could not state the exact words of the original book and I gave the Persian book to the translator to be translated. I wrote down all that came to my mind and I did no editing; thus, you see repeated sentences in this book. The tone of the book is informal and intimate wherever the quotation is mine. The reason I did no editing is that I ran short of time. I bought the books on relativity about a year ago. I wanted to know what the theory of relativity is that it has reverberated so much. When I read those books I found that the theory of relativity says very strange things. I begun to study hard and after some months I found that it is impossible that this theory is coherent and it is impossible that there is no contradiction in this theory. This theory leads to illogical results. While this theory lost its significance in my opinion and it becomes clear to me that this theory is not strong, I realized that Einstein on November 25, 1915 presented the actual Einstein field equations to the Prussian Academy of sciences. But this date was very familiar to me. My birthday is 24 November 1985. I became more interested and decided to continue my studies in order to prove that this theory is totally unacceptable and wrong and also reject the theory right on 24 November 2015. In this case, the birthday of the theory and my birthday and the deathday of the theory all three are coincident.

My English Word file was ready on 24 Nov 2015, but due to the errors of translators and typists, I could not prepare the English Word file on the same day because I had to edit it and give the wrongly translated parts to other translators so that they could be translated correctly. Anyhow, I wanted to publish my book at the same time and therefore I sent my book in the handwritten form on 24 November 2015 for so many professors. I do not know why they did not answer me. Perhaps, because the book I sent them was in Persian and they don’t know Persian, but I also sent a PDF version in English in which the theory was rejected. It was a hand-written PDF. It was four pages. Whether they did not read my PDF because it was a hand-written or was my proof wrong? I do not know. But the more I think, I find that there was no mistake. However, this time I sent the book in English and in a typed form, maybe this time I get a response. In this book, any true words I have said are the result of God’s auspices and any error I have made is mine.

O Allah my Lord O Teacher of David, teach me. O You who made Sulaiman understand make me understand!

[Followed by almost 400 pages of nonsense]

Thursday, November 10, 2016

waiting for a renowned magazine that dares to publish my article


RE: Erik Verlinde his article: Emergent Gravity and the Dark Universehttps://arxiv.org/pdf/1611.02269v2.pdf

I send you this message to show that there is also a less esoteric kind of physics that also explains, in a simple but most fundamental way, that Einstein’s two theories on relativity are untenable. To express it mildly.

The latest version of my arguments is published at http://vixra.org/abs/1611.0111  The Principle of Absolute Relativity.

The abstract sounds:

The Special Relativity Theory (SRT) is based on two, in 1905 by Einstein proposed, presumptions: the first one, labelled by Einstein as the Principle of Relativity, 
the second one defining the supposed property of the speed of light in vacuum. 
This article shows how close Einstein, as well as Lorentz, has been to a solid solution of the problems physicists encountered a century ago, observing electro-magnetic phenomena. 
It also shows that Einstein’s PoR is a fundamentally restricted version of the “now-a-days-PoR”.    

I invite you to show me specific/pertinent flaws in this article .

Please don’t tell me that I don’t understand Einstein’s SRT. That is true, just like it is true that I don’t understand that 1+1 = 3.

To be honest: based on a 30 years old experience and on a countless number of discussions with dozens of physicists I can predict you for sure that you will not find such flaws.

To be honest once again: I’m waiting for the physicist that dares to admit openly that my arguments are correct.

And I’m also waiting for a renowned magazine that dares to publish my article.

It took Arxiv half a year before it decided not to publish my submission. Without any relevant argument!

Kind regards,

Sjaak Uitterdijk