From: uitterdijk <sjaakenlutske@hetnet.nl> Subject: High energy particles
Dear Physicist, You herewith are informed about the article titled: Velocity of cosmic muons most likely much higher than c The abstract sounds: It seems to be the most attractive experiment for physicists, who strongly believe in the validity of the STR, to refer to: the supposed half-life time, in combination with their supposed velocity, of muons entering the atmosphere. The crucial part of the experiment is the application of the equation E=mc2. This article shows that, by applying this equation, the one error in STR is used to prove the apparent validity of another error in this theory. The article also shows how extremely magical physics has become. Scientists should, due to their position in society, only think logically The article is found at: http://vixra.org/pdf/1708.0087v1.pdf For those who do, for whatever reason, not want to visit viXra, the article is attached too. Kind regards,    Sjaak Uitterdijk
*******************************************8

From: uitterdijk <sjaakenlutske@hetnet.nl> Subject: HEP reaction Dear Physicist, One, out of the 7000 addressed physicists, did react upon my e-mail with the subject “High Energy Particles”. He is a long term expert on HEP. His reaction is, to my opinion, representative for the majority of physicists, regarding their attitude with respect to the STR. For that reason I want to inform you about this reaction and my reply on it. I changed his name in Messenger. See the attachment: "reply to the messenger”. Again to my opinion the meant attitude can be described as: ignore whichever evidence showing the invalidity of the STR. In my reply I wrote the sentence: “Great! But if you would be a genuine scientist you would wonder why the synchrotron works so perfectly, while its design is based on a nonsense theory. “ After all I should have added the following consideration. At the moment Einstein rejected correctly the ether model, he would, if he would have been a genuine scientist, have wondered himself why Fresnel once deduced a correct mathematical description of the velocity of light in a moving medium. Fresnel did so by applying the ether model! The correctness of this description has later on been proved experimentally by Fizeau. Einstein never even mentioned this problem. I met this problem too at the moment I proved, in the most fundamental thinkable way (shown in the other attachment), that the reference for the velocity of light in vacuum must be its source. The solution of this problem is simple: take the source as reference for the velocities applied in Fresnel’s expression and nothing has to be changed in his expression. Fizeau’s experiment is necessarily carried out in this way, because the medium moved with respect to the source and the light did so too! Hopefully you will, for one time, lay aside your religious-like believe in the validity of the STR, if applicable, and read the two attachments.
Kind regards,
Sjaak Uitterdijk