| Subject: | Spin v. Superconductor ? |
|---|---|
| From: | Mikki <stmmrv@verizon.net> |
04/09/2018
Dear Professors:
Good work !
I am sure, you can recall unknown “Satyendra Bose” who became known by “god-Einstein” as a result of ‘Bose–Einstein condensate (BEC
in 1924-5CE)’—a state of
matter or gas-bosons cooled
to temperatures very
close to absolute zero a large fraction of bosons occupy the
lowest quantum state
or at extremely low density of about 1/100,000 of the
density of normal air.
By the way, they are ‘cold-dark
atoms’—I am sure, now, you know ‘what makes the
Radio-waves’. Recall “Gama-wave” (shorter-length wave) at
Sun becoming a “Radio-wave” (longer-length wave) by the Time
it goes beyond Earth. And, we think the measure of the speed
of light at Earth is a Universal constant—wrong. No wonder all our measures to the
Stars in Space are wrong.
Although I disagree with spin-½
or spin-3/2 (because, in reality the constituents
in an ‘atom’ spin-1, or spin-360 degrees—it is a Major
topic to discuss here), I see confirmation of a
fundamental-principle of Nature—The speed of light varies from point to point: shorter wave
meant slow-speed, and longer wave meant high-speed. That’s the ONLY point you can
make from your-experiments. How come?
Like I said spin is constant (although
speed of spin varies)—so, its’ impact on your ‘hot-atom’ as to how fast it travels
should be ‘zero’: If so, what is causing this
Superconductor at “temperatures very
close to absolute zero”—genius Bose
gave the answer in 1924CE “extremely
low density” which allows
the ‘hot-atom’ travel at high-speed.
I wish you good luck with your
research---
Maheswar
