mountain doesn't presses under herself? really?

From: <usbpic@seznam.cz>

Subject: important mistake in the physics

Dear  Professors and institutions

please somebody in the wolrd, finally, answer something.

g vectors are not parallel, so x part of g exists.

Which G constant is now more constant (on the left or the right picture?)

If we use g convergence (instead of G), then it describes the world correctly.

---------

Einstein's  tea leaf paradox explanation is absolutely impossible to simulate.

But if we use my Tea leaf explanation, then the universe becomes intelligible.

Tea leaf paradox explanation:

everything is be based on the maintaining of the own inertia of the rotating medium

First is working centrifugal acceleration field (analog of H in electricity, that is why we have a moon and planet's rings), then works -coriolis field (analog of E in the electricity). Maintaining of the own inertia causes our rotating for 14 mlrd years (spinning dancer effect)

m is C in electricity

If we use equations for 1 charge Q (one rotating center= one charge), then g in the center of the Earth must be much bigger, and then the g convergence could be instead of G.

Of cause growing g convergence will affect the g under the earth surface, but it doesn't mean g is not growing.

Jolly-type experiments are impracticable- sensitive to the g convergence:

Please imagine the 3 points line: 1. weight, 2. weight, 3. -the center of the Earth: 1um vertical deviation between weights makes 6m deviation from the straight line.

If I am right, then there must be differencies between G on the pole and Equator's mountain (Chimborazo)

On Chimborazo and mountains closer to the equator they have "Bouguer anomalies":

"Bouguer anomalies are usually negative in mountains because they are associated with a decrease in the attraction of the mountain mass by about 100 milligalls per kilometer of mountain height. In large mountainous regions, they are even more negative due to isostasy: the density of mountain roots is lower compared to the surrounding earth's mantle, which causes a further deficit of gravity."

WHAT? less density under the mountain? mountain doesn't presses under herself? really? :)

 

 ps

And here is how to keep the flame for the termonuclear reaction, your theory can not explain that, and also violates the energy conservation law.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u71QpmObbhk

https://news.ucsc.edu/2018/05/hurricane-antimatter.html

pps also comets are shock waves in the nonisotermic plasma (so called soliton)

and here is how photons probably looks like (something between wave and corpuscula): 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXkWSgU-CL0

 

-- 
Sincerely Yours, 
Ing. Vladislav Chechelev
Czech Republic